# Buy value 618# based on price/performance, combined with a few simple parameters, look at the recent Sony ZM and Samsung TVs with a higher point rate on the ZDM

Xiaobian Note: The article comes from the ## Buy Value 618# Call for Papers. As an annual event, what kind of pick-up plan does this 618 have? Share your shopping experience and talk about your familiar brand story. Participate in the latest call for papers and get the chance to receive the award-winning 3,980-yuan LIFAair smart air purifier and the award-winning Prada glasses worth RMB 1980, and look forward to your participation.

In the previous article, “#Buy Values ​​618# rushed to 6.18, and forcibly brainwashed — talking about several “hard indicators” of television performance that were often overlooked.” After the publication, many valued friends were collected, commented, and rewarded. Thanks in advance.

In the article commentary, the most common sentence that appears is "If you recommend a few models, it's fine." Actually, the landlord would like to recommend it. However, in the light of the fact that if you filter it out according to the eight criteria in the last article, almost all are These are high-end models with relatively high prices and low discounts (the panel refresh rate can kill a large number of models), and it is not worthwhile to buy them. If they are not recommended according to this standard, they will be a little self-defense. a feeling of. The second is that each valued friend has a different emphasis on television needs and preferences. For example, value-friends only need large screens for televisions, and value-friends c have higher requirements for picture quality and image processing chips. Of course, these two requirements are not necessarily inevitable. Conflict, but combined with the price, it may appear that only one of two alternatives, simply according to product-side recommendations, will inevitably be unable to take care of another part of value-friends. The third reason is that if you simply recommend a few models under a few brands, it is suspected of being suspicious.

However, these days, when it is worthwhile to buy, there are occasional promotions for television offers. Some of them are historically low prices and cause a lot of discussion. Therefore, it is simply a bargain that can be purchased cheaply, and it is worth buying. Push the TV.

From which entry point in terms? There are too many brands and models of self-owned brands, and the length of the lectures is too long. So this article just talk about two real joint venture brands: Sony, Samsung (LG is less focused and less hot, so it is not the focus). Generally speaking, the TVs recommended for TV channels worth buying and finding channels are mostly considered to be relatively affordable. If they can cause arousal and commentary, it is definitely a comparative value. Here are the two joint venture brands. Among the recent models that are worth buying, there are pushes and there is a lot of repercussions, to see what is true.

The first explanation is that, although it is based on the cost-effective theme, but not altogether set aside a few indicators mentioned in the previous article, just in front of the price, to achieve the choices on the indicators

The order of priorities considered by most people for buying television should be this: size - price - various indicators, regardless of size here, only talking about the same level of relatively affordable price, analysis of the end value is not worth .

Sony:

In general, if you want to buy expensive and right, then Sony is naturally right. However, I can't run away from the question. Here I'm looking for a few of the more recent Aunt's recommendations for comparison. The price (low price and high popularity in recent times) is:

KD-49X7000D /3999,

KD-55X7000D/4599,

KD-55X8000E/5699,

KD-65X6000D/5999

At first glance, these seem to be a good choice, if you want to buy a large size, then directly choose KD-65X6000D, if you want to buy a moderate price, then choose KD-55X7000D (this is also the current Sony TV sales on Jingdong The highest, if you do not mind the size, then choose KD-49X7000D, according to this purchase, in fact, it is true, but as a buyer, you must find out the four models before and after the price difference is not big, in the configuration What's the difference?

First of all, say KD-55X7000D, on the side of the Sony model compared to the configuration down, this in my opinion is a higher cost of the current one, before I see some people say this model benchmarking last year's 8000c, In fact, it is just a price benchmark (even 7000d more expensive), compared to the 8000c, Jane is equipped with the X1 chip is very important for image processing and is proud of Sony, but also increased HDR, , This is what I mentioned in the previous article, the choice between the core configuration and the popular configuration, before the 8000c to sell cheaper, and some people are too expensive, but now they do not know how to cherish, may come next year, the standard HDR The model threshold will be further improved. Pulling away, although Jane has been equipped with the X1 chip, the 4K sharp image processing engine PRO and MotionFlow XR have been retained. The former has great help in image quality optimization. Direct-type backlighting, Sony is also more kind in terms of interface. Four 2.0 HDMI interfaces and three 3.0 USB interfaces ensure that the 4K@60Hz HDR function can be successfully turned on. It is worth buying a historical low price of 4,000 yuan for the Twelve-Year Tmall Store last year. If not, Anxious to buy a friend can wait until 618 to see the price, but in any case, this model is worth the current price of Sony's models. If the budget is limited, especially for those who do not pursue large-size ps4 gamers, they can start with the 49X7000D. This model is the recommended Dafa entry model for PS4 players who can start HDR and can do low-latency games.

That is more than 55x7000d expensive 550 of the 55x8000e, where is the money where you spend it? First of all, it is a more beautiful and slim body design (side-entry backlight), and secondly, it is with the Sony housekeeping technology Terri charm, in the color can be more beautiful. If you have a quest for the appearance and color of this TV, then this model is worthy of your start. Terricolor is now considered the entry standard for Sony's midrange models. For the pursuit of large-size users, the 65-inch KD-65X6000D with a price difference of 300 between the 8000e may meet your requirements in terms of size. Of course, the configuration is also greatly reduced, except that there is no 4K sharp image processing engine PRO, HDR function and The Android smart system (which is a gospel to some people, on the other hand) has also lost HDMI 2.0 and usb 3.0 on the interface (for verification purposes), and the machine is not a product of Shanghai Sogo (for faith in pure descent). It is Xiamen TPV. Fortunately, the MotionFlow XR related to the motion picture has not been subtracted. On the comparison between the two, I read a lot of forum posts. Many people say that there is no difference in dynamics between 6000d and 7000d (theoretically impossible) There is a difference), even in the picture color can also be evenly divided, in fact, it is not impossible, like the 850b and 950b that year, the latter with Terri charm, but I went to several stores, according to their own viewing and sales The long-term sales conclusions (one of whom was an acquaintance who recommended me to buy Panasonic plasma at the time) all indicated that the 850b was more resistant to color. Therefore, in terms of color, or to go to the store itself to experience the actual experience, the model I think is more suitable not like the smart system, usually only look at non-4K sources and there is no demand for HDR and very attached to the Sony brand and large-size models People, it is recommended to go to the store in the actual comparison of the next 7000d, the picture is not much difference between the words can enter, after all, the impact of large-size impact is also part of the visual enjoyment.

Of course, if you want to take into account the large size and quality and dynamic effect of the value of friends, recommend the 7500d (7566d) series, although the X1 chip is also castrated, but the dead dead camel than the horse, to retain the 120Hz is very important for dynamic images Refresh rate panel. Recently worth buying and pushing the historical low price of 7799 yuan, 1800 than the KD-65X6000D expensive, but in exchange for the 120Hz panel and a number of image technology, I think it is worth buying a large-size models.

Samsung:

It is worth buying a good price and discovering the channels. The recent hot models are:

UA40KUF30EJXXZ / 2399,

UA50KUF30EJXXZ / 2799,

UA55JU50SWJXXZ / 2999,

UA55KU6100JXXZ / 3499,

UA55KUF30ZJXXZ / 3599,

UA65KUF30EJXXZ / 5299

A closer look at these Samsung models will reveal that except for the UA55JU50SWJXXZ which does not carry HDR, all models are equipped with HDR, Ultra HD quality enhancement engine, Ultra HD local area control light, Ultra HD high-definition picture quality, and sharp contrast enhancement. The kind of image technology that looks like looks very kind, so there is no difference between them?

From the first few hours of this article, it is worth buying and selling a Samsung UA50KUF30EJXXZ / 2799 discount information. It can be said that since this time, the maximum number of points is the most enthusiastic Samsung product. Why? The reason is because it is cost-effective. Here is a comparison of the above models for this model.

UA50KUF30EJXXZ is actually the UA50KU6300 network version model, at least from the comparison of the two parameters, regardless of technical specifications, hardware specifications, and even to the product power consumption, single screen size, single screen weight are all the same hair, the only visible difference is In the base and remote control (6300 for smart remote control). Because of support for HDR, the 6300 is often recommended as an entry-level model in the PS4. Samsung models use the TIZEN operating system, and the faster boot speed is also one of its advantages. In addition, I don't know why each major website page shows that Samsung TV's HDMI interface is 1.4. Note that all models are! Consulting Jingdong customer service, also said that all Samsung models do not bring hdmi2.0! In fact, this TV is equipped with an HDMI2.0 interface (2.0a or 2.0b will be waiting for you to verify), not to mention other higher-end models.

This picture shows a support table for various video formats of Samsung's official website UA50KU6300J series, which supports 4k@60Hz playback and shows that one of the HDMI interfaces is 2.0.

As for the lack of configuration, no USB3.0 interface is definitely a bad injury.

This picture shows the usb interface part. The two interfaces are all black and the probability is 2.0.

At least from the parameters, the price of 2799 is still worth buying. Similarly, the UA65KUF30EJXXZ / 5299 large size UA40KUF30EJXXZ / 2399 and the small size UA40KUF30EJXXZ / 2399 that are worth buying and pushing are also very competitive.

However, many people may think that the 50-inch is a bit small and the 65-inch is too large, so they will look to the 5-inch UA55KUF30ZJXXZ. The recent recommendation is to buy the recommended price of 3599. The appearance looks more beautiful, and it seems to be quite true. Value, Jingdong Samsung's top sales also confirmed this point. But these are the "if" the model in the technical specifications and UA50KUF30E the same situation, the problem is that the two models seemingly little difference in the name, in fact, there is a huge difference in hardware, the most obvious point is to look at the product Power consumption, 50-inch UA50KUF30E is 190w, while the 55-inch UA55KUF30Z is only 125w, the size is large, and power consumption is reduced, many people may think that low power consumption is not a good thing? In fact, not necessarily, especially in the same brand with the same price segment with the backlight type models, the reduction of power consumption is more likely to mean the reduction of the backlight source, which is directly caused by the reduction of brightness, and the internal hardware configuration from the single Screen weight is also evident, ua55ku6300 single screen weighs 15.2kg, ua50ku6300 (UA50KUF30E) is 12.2kg, and this UA55KUF30Z is only 13.2kg, is more like the sister model of UA55KU6100, (both in power consumption and single Consistent screen weight, speaker power is also shrinking to 8w*2, in fact, how the specifications of the TV can be seen from some details), rather than a higher level of ku6300.

The price of 2999 UA55JU50SWJXXZ, functionally reduced HDR function, but in terms of power consumption and single-screen weight, this model is close to ku6300, 180w and 15.2kg (data also shows 163w/15.8kg ). Not surprisingly, the brightness of this model should be better than UA55KUF30Z.

Looks may be a bit messy, list it

In fact, such a comparison, you can see, as 40,50,65 inch KUF30E Department category, in addition to the interface is not USB3.0, other aspects of the configuration is pretty good, and the other more popular models, in Hardware has a different shrink, combined with the price, in the end worth it, to see your own judgments.

——————————————————————————————

See here, you may find that if you compare the Samsung KUF30E series with the two models of the same Sony price segment, 5699 KD-55X8000E and 5999 KD-65X6000D do not seem to have the advantage, 65KUF30E and the price is similar Compared with the 55X8000E, although the picture quality is not as good as it is, it is ten inches bigger in size. Compared with the same size 65X6000d, it has the upper hand in terms of interface and technical specifications. The 50-inch 50kuf30e is also able to compete with the 3999 49x7000d on the premise that the technical specifications do not decline.

Just looking at the parameters seems to be true, but put aside the belief in Sony's belief, to test the quality of the machine to sell the market, with the specifications of Samsung and Sony in the screen effect is still a gap

At the same time, Sony's (w850b) and Samsung's (f6300) Full HD models have similar long-term viewing experience at home with similar specifications (panel refresh rate, dynamic frame compensation interpolation frame rate, and control light). Sony is better at color than Samsung. Sony's picture looked at the biggest feeling is not glare, soft colors, and Samsung's picture, is no matter how tune, there is a kind of color saturation too high screen too sharp feeling, look uncomfortable for a long time. In terms of dynamic performance, Sony surpasses Samsung one level. Under the large scene shift, Samsung's screen will produce a noticeable sense of tear, and the upper and lower edges will also have a sense of ambiguity. The only thing that Samsung is better than Sony is that it is finer than Sony in partition control. Of course, these are my personal views in the full HD era for both, in the 4K era, according to my comparison of several times to sell, Samsung's screen is still as usual with high saturation, other aspects of performance to be worth Friends study.

In fact, the election of television, in addition to the price, or specific comparison of specific models, in my opinion there is no worth buying brand, only worth buying models. For example, LG's 4-color screen 4K TV, according to the previous article, said the use of WRGB panel 4K, in the fine-grained pixel, it is better to use 3-color panel models, but it is not entirely without advantages, most of its midrange Type, the panel refresh rate reached 120Hz, and most models are using direct-type backlight, to know that the TV with 120Hz/RGB/4K panel are mostly higher-end high-end models, the budget is limited Under the premise of the picture quality and dynamics, how do you weigh?